One other learning outcome that I feel I improved on in this process was 1. “Demonstrate the ability to approach writing as a recursive process that requires substantial revision of drafts for content, organization, and clarity (global revision), as well as editing and proofreading (local revision).” I thought that doing global revision first allowed to focus on looking for areas to change in content and structure during the revision process. I was able to make adjustments to certain transitions and my naysayer paragraph by using this learning outcome. Also, it was easier for me to focus on local revision and picking out errors there, after the global revision was already done.
Category: Writing as a recursive process
Categories
- Active Reading
- Career Development
- Change
- Collaboration
- EBP II Posts
- ENG 110
- EPB 1 Posts
- Ethics
- Goal Setting
- Integrating Ideas
- Licensure
- MLA and Conventions
- NSG 202
- NSG 202 Posts
- NSG 307 Posts
- NSG 315 Posts
- NSG 328 Posts
- NSG 332 Posts
- NSG 342 Posts
- NSG 420 Posts
- NSG 424 Posts
- NSG 432 Posts
- NSG 442 Posts
- NSG 445 Posts
- NSG 447 Posts
- Nursing 351 Posts
- Peer Review
- PICOT
- prewriting
- Professionalism
- Reflection
- Research
- Revision
- Role of Nurse
- Self Care
- Writing as a recursive process
Recent Comments