The active reading strategy I used for these sources was annotation. I highlighted important quotes or pieces of information that I thought were important, and might be used in the essay. With the information that I highlighted I briefly summarized it or explained why it was important.
Category: Active Reading
While using the chunking annotation method I highlighted and bracketed claims and underlined evidence or arguments that could be used to support that claim. I did not do much extra annotation because I had highlighted or underlined most of the paper. Some of the pros for this process were that I feel like I was able to find all of the claims and understand the writers main argument. However, some cons would be that I felt the process to be very cluttered and I was only focused on finding the claims. Personally, I don’t think this style works the best for me and I felt I would have been more efficient with another method.
“The ability to understand how context, audience, and identity intersect is one of the central challenges people face in learning how to navigate social media” (Boyd 30).
“But more often than not, teens talked about wanting to have a space where they weren’t constantly scruitinized by adults and peers. By becoming anonymous and being an invisible part of a crowd, these teens knew that they weren’t building a reputation within the site”(Boyd 43).
“Teens are struggling to make sense of who they are and how they fit into society in an environment in which contexts are networked and collapsed, audiences are invisible, and anything they say or do can be easily taken out of context” (Boyd 53).
The annotation method I used for this section of Bains Chapter 2 “What Makes an Expert?” is the one I typically use. For this section of annotating I looked for summary, quotes, different learning styles, and text to text connections. With the annotation method I use I highlight important segments of what I’m reading, and how they relate to the task at hand. Then I will usually make a few notes about what I highlight to analyze and remind myself why I highlighted it if I end up going back to the reading. I find that this is a pretty effective method for me.
“The Editor” podcast tells the story of Robin Woods and his unlikely correspondence with Merriam Webster editor Mark Stevens. Robin starts off by discussing the crime that sentenced him to 16 years in Maryland Correctional Institute. Robin had stolen twenty thousand dollars worth of office equipment and was turned in by a friend. This prison sentence was not justified to Robin as he had been to prison before and was never in for this long. MCI was the worst prison Robin had been held in, as the guards were very brutal and often beat prisoners. He described the atmosphere as “every man for themselves”. Robin was later charged for inciting a riot, was beat by the guards and then transferred to another prison and was classified as one of the most dangerous prisoners in Maryland. He knew he was not dangerous as he had “seen the worst of what man can do to each other”.
As a child, Robin started off really liking school but was put into special education and did chores for the school, never really learning how to read. In the new prison he was kept in mostly solitary confinement and one day heard “Library Call” so he picked up two books. Originally he could understand 30-40% of the page but it got easier for him as time went on. Finishing his first book was life changing for Robin as he had defied what people had told him he could never do. Robin wanted to learn more about the world so he ordered a Merriam Webster encyclopedia in 2005. He eventually found an error and wrote to the editor Mark Stevens. Mark responded to Robin congratulating him on finding the error, which Robin described “felt like getting an A in English”. Over the next two years Robin found 12 more errors and continued corresponding with Mark, who began to think of him as a freelance editor for the encyclopedia.
In 2006 Robin found out he was being transferred and couldn’t take his books with him. He wrote to Stevens, who then wrote to the warden and shortened Robin’s sentence. He was released with fifty dollars cash and had trouble finding work and paying rent. However, Stevens would send Robin money throughout their correspondence. Robin and Mark finally met after a decade of correspondence, and discussed many different topics. When Robin got back he found his house was broken into which he found ironic. Robin says he doesn’t read as much anymore because he now gets to experience the outside world, and Mark was laid off from Merriam Webster because people do not read as much anymore. I really enjoyed this podcast, I thought it was very interesting to see the different perspectives that Robin and Mark both had.
When annotating Carol Dweck’s TED talk I mainly utilized highlighting, underlining, and summarizing sections of text. In this text I highlighted important information regarding the argument, and Dweck’s views on the topic. I also highlighted the differences between the growth mindset and the more fixed grading mindset. I underlined a few quotes and anecdotes that I also thought were important to the argument. After highlighting and underlining I went back and made some notes summarizing both views and wrote down some questions I had. I also made notes about my views on the topic. When annotating I typically use a structure similar to this because I feel if I highlight and take notes I have a good understanding on what the topic is about.
Recent Comments