Our team did need to revise our topic and question slightly. Our topic involves mental health and psychological affects after an amputation. We ended up getting rid of the time component as it wasn’t necessary and thinking more about what specific negative psychological effects we could look into such as anxiety, anger, hostility, and the tendency towards social isolation. It was a bit challenging to revise our PICOT question at first, but I feel that we were able to make some good improvements. A success we experienced was finding three good articles for our paper. We looked into a lot of articles regarding amputation and decided ours should be focused more on traumatic amputations versus planned amputations. I think focusing on traumatic amputations will make it easier to explore negative psychological effects. Our process of finding the articles worked well as we each picked a few we though would work, and then went through the articles together to pick the most relevant ones.
Recent Comments
- elizabethmann on Preparation for Licensure and Transition to Professional Practice
- elizabethmann on Attaining and Protecting Your Professional Nursing License
- elizabethmann on Career Development
- sheath3 on Cover Letter
- sheath3 on New Grad Resume
Categories
- Active Reading
- Career Development
- Change
- Collaboration
- EBP II Posts
- ENG 110
- EPB 1 Posts
- Ethics
- Goal Setting
- Integrating Ideas
- Licensure
- MLA and Conventions
- NSG 202
- NSG 202 Posts
- NSG 307 Posts
- NSG 315 Posts
- NSG 328 Posts
- NSG 332 Posts
- NSG 342 Posts
- NSG 420 Posts
- NSG 424 Posts
- NSG 432 Posts
- NSG 442 Posts
- NSG 445 Posts
- NSG 447 Posts
- Nursing 351 Posts
- Peer Review
- PICOT
- prewriting
- Professionalism
- Reflection
- Research
- Revision
- Role of Nurse
- Self Care
- Writing as a recursive process
Leave a Reply